FEDERAL AGENCY:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
AUTHORIZATION:
National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended, Public Law 103-327, 42 U.S.C 1861
et seq.
OBJECTIVES:
To provide leadership and ensure the vitality of the nation's science, mathematics,
engineering and technology education enterprise from K-16, and through graduate levels.
Long-term goals include: supporting infrastructure that will provide a high-quality
educational experience for all children and learners; ensuring that our educational
pipelines yield adequately educated individuals for the highly technical workplace as well
as a body of well-educated scientists and engineers that respond to the nation's needs;
and encouraging the development of a cadre of professionally educated and trained
teachers. EHR supports activities in K-12 systemic education reform; as well as projects
to improve the delivery of elementary, secondary, informal, undergraduate, and graduate,
education. Human resource development, education research, and evaluation of programs are
also supported, as well as activities under the Experimental Program to Stimulate
Competitive Research (EPSCoR).
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE:
Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS:
Grant funds may be used for costs necessary to conduct research, educational activities
or studies, including salaries and expenses, permanent equipment, expendable equipment and
supplies, travel, publication costs, and other direct and indirect costs. Primary
responsibility for general supervision of all grant activities rests with the grantee
institution. Funds may not be used for purposes other than those specified in the award.
Graduate fellowships provide for stipends and allowances to be paid to the awardee through
his/her institution; a fixed cost-of-education allowance is paid directly to the
institution. H-1B Nonimmigrant Petitioner scholarships for tuition, displacement of loans
and college/university-provided grants, and miscellaneous academic expenses will be paid
to the awardee through his/her institution. Scholarships are restricted to fields of
computer science, engineering, mathematics, and engineering and computer technology at
associate, baccalaureate, masters and doctoral levels, pursuant to Title IV of the
American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-277). NSF does
not provide funds directly to individuals for the payment of private or public tuition
expenses.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Public and private colleges (2-year
and 4- year) and universities, State and local educational agencies, nonprofit and private
organizations, professional societies, science academies and centers, science museums and
zoological parks, research laboratories, and other institutions with an educational
mission may apply.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Elementary, secondary and
undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering, and technology teachers and faculty;
preK-12, undergraduate and graduate students; public and private colleges (2-year and
4-year) and universities; State and local educational agencies; nonprofit and private
organizations; professional societies; science academies and centers; science museums and
zoological parks; research laboratories; and other institutions with an educational
mission.
Credentials/Documentation: Proposals must be signed by the
Principal Investigator(s) and by an official authorized to commit the institution in
business and financial affairs. Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB Circular
No. A-21 for colleges and universities, No. A-87 for State and local governments, and No.
A-122 for nonprofit organizations. Applicants for fellowship support must show evidence of
ability such as academic records, letters of recommendation, graduate record examination
scores, and grade point average. Applications for H-1B Nonimmigrant Petitioner
scholarships require documentation of financial need, evidence of inclination to pursue
study in targeted disciplines, and evidence of academic ability.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: In selected areas, discussion
with NSF program staff is strongly recommended and/or submission of a preliminary proposal
is required before submitting formal proposals. Other areas are eligible for coverage
under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant
should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or
her State for more information on the process that the State requires to be followed in
applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: By electronic submission via FastLane
of a formal proposal, and, in some programs, a preliminary proposal, describing the
planned project and the proposed amount of the grant. For guidelines, see specific program
announcements and "Grant Proposal Guide," NSF 01-2.
Award Procedure: NSF staff members review and evaluate all
proposals based on a set of criteria established by the National Science Board. In most
cases reviews are undertaken with the advice of scientists, engineers, educators and other
appropriate persons who are specialists in the fields covered by the proposals. External
reviewers, who are conversant with the fields covered by the applications, review and
evaluate all graduate fellowship applications. Awards are made by NSF on a competitive
basis.
Deadlines: Deadlines and target dates are published in the
NSF bulletin and program announcements.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: For ninety-five percent
of proposals, NSF will be able to advise applicants whether their proposals have been
declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on the
proposal deadline/target date (or from the date of actual receipt if the program does not
use deadline or target dates). The time interval ends when the cognizant NSF Division
Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation.
Appeals: The principal investigator may request, in writing
within 90 days of a declination or return, that the Foundation reconsider its action in
declining or returning any proposal or application.
Renewals: Contact NSF program staff for specific renewal
policies and procedures.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Programs have no statutory
formula. Projects vary with regard to the required level of institutional contribution or
cost-sharing; requirements are provided in program announcements. Under the "Course,
Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement" and "Advanced Technological
Education" programs, funds requested for equipment and other technology must be
matched by a nonfederal contribution equal to or greater than the NSF contribution.
Adaptation and Implementation projects under the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory
Improvement program require matching of the entire NSF budget request. Minority serving
institutions that are covered by Executive Order (i.e., Historically Black Colleges and
Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, and Tribal Colleges) and that do not offer
SMET degrees beyond the baccalaureate level are exempted from this requirement. The Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG)(Chapter II) and the Grant Policy Manual (Sec. 330) provide additional
information as to these requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Up to 5 years.
Assistance is disbursed by letter of credit or as required. For fellowships, typically 9
to 12 months; up to 3 years of support. Assistance is disbursed to the institution for
monthly stipend allotment to the fellow. Annual H-1B scholarships are awarded through
institutions; reapplication is required.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: A substantive technical report is required upon
completion of the project. Frequency and complexity of interim reports varies among
programs depending on size, scope and program objective. Quarterly Federal Cash
Transactions Reports (SF 272) are required. For fellowships, brief annual activities
reports are required.
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No.
A- 133 (Revised, June 24, 1997), "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations," nonfederal entities that receive financial assistance of $300,000 or
more in Federal awards will have a single or a program-specific audit conducted for that
year. Nonfederal entities that expend less than $300,000 a year in Federal awards are
exempt from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No.
A-133.
Records: Grantees are expected to maintain separate records
for each grant to ensure that funds are used for the general purpose for which the grant
was made. Records are subject to inspection during the life of the grant and for three
years thereafter. Special record keeping requirements apply to fellowships.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 49-0106-0-1-251.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 99 $663,000,000; FY 00 est
$724,000,000; and FY 01 est $760,000,000. (Includes H-1B Nonimmigrant Petitioner Fees).
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: From $2,500 to
$4,000,000; $117,600.
PROGAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
In fiscal year 1999, approximately 2,460 awards were made and 13,720 proposals were
received. In fiscal year 2000, approximately 2,550 awards will be made and 14,150
proposals are expected to be received; in fiscal year 2001, approximately 2,550 awards
will be made and 14,180 proposals are expected to be received. H-1B Nonimmigrant
Petitioner scholarship activity is estimated to result in over 100 awards to institutions
in fiscal year 2001 resulting in over 8,000 scholarship opportunities.
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE:
45 CFR Chapter VI; 48 CFR Chapter 25; "NSF Guide to Programs, FY 2001," NSF
01-3 (http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf013); "Grant Proposal Guide," NSF
01-2 (http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf012).
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
Headquarters Office: Assistant Director, Education and Human
Resources, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 805, Arlington, VA 22230.
Telephone: (703) 292-8600. NSF World Wide Web site URL: http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/.
Web Site Address: http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS:
(1) The "Educational Software Components of Tomorrow (ESCOT)" project (a
collaboration among nine universities, business, industry, and private foundations) seeks
to develop and link software components for the K-12 classroom and understand how to
stimulate teachers to customize software for specific lessons. (2) The
"Misconceptions About Complex Causality" project (Harvard University is the lead
institution) explores how students bring to their learning certain assumptions about the
nature of causal patterns that persist and surface in later, even adult, scientific
reasoning. The project will develop interventions that lead to increased sophistication of
students' causal modeling. (3) The "QuarkNet" project (based at the FERMI
National Accelerator Laboratory) provides five years of intensive summer research
experiences in physics for secondary teachers, including development of a web-based
mechanism for transferring research results to their respective classrooms, along with
access to real-time data. (4) The "Promoting Excellence in Teaching and Research in
the Neurosciences" project is part of NSF's outreach to Historically Black Colleges
and Universities (HBCU). The project will develop research and educational opportunities
in the neurosciences to enrich academic preparation of students at Morehouse College, an
HBCU. (5) A "Virtual Laboratory for Training Machine-tool Building and Maintenance
Technicians" (Northern Illinois University) is part of NSF's Advanced Technological
Education program. This project will develop and test curricula in a virtual lab via the
Internet to enhance comprehension of the interdisciplinary nature of machine tool building
and maintenance technology.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS:
The National Science Board approved revised criteria for evaluating proposals submitted
to NSF at its meeting on March 28, 1997 (NSB97-72). The revised criteria are designed to
be useful and relevant across NSF's many different programs, however, NSF will continue to
employ special criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain
programs and activities. The revised merit review criteria are listed below. Following
each criterion are potential considerations that the reviewer may employ in the
evaluation. These are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. Each
reviewer will address only those that are relevant to the proposal and for which he/she is
qualified to make judgments. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed
activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding
within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer
(individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on
the quality of prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore
creative and original concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity?
Is there sufficient access to resources? Criterion 2: What are the broader impacts of the
proposed activity? How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while
promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden
the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability,
geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and
education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the
results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding?
What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society? In addition to these
criteria, many EHR programs employ special criteria to highlight specific educational
objectives; see relevant program announcements and guidelines. In addition, consideration
will also be given to the following: (a) Integration of Research and Education: One of the
principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and
education through the programs, projects and activities it supports at academic and
research institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals
may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where
all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and
enrich research through the diversity of learner perspectives. Principal Investigators
should address this issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information
necessary to respond fully to both NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give it
careful consideration in making funding decisions. (b) Integrating Diversity into NSF
Programs, Projects and Activities: Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation
of all citizens - women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with
disabilities - are essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is
committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects,
and activities it considers and supports. Principal Investigators should address this
issue in their proposal to provide reviewers with the information necessary to respond
fully to both NSF merit review criteria. NSF staff will give it careful consideration in
making funding decisions.